"They" wrote the speech first, then picked a VP nominee...gee, shocking

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/03/AR2008090301176.html

Not anticipating that McCain would choose a woman as his running mate, the speech that was prepared in advance was "very masculine," according to campaign manager Rick Davis, and "we had to start from scratch."
-------------------http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2008/09/putting_words_in_palins_mouth.html

"While we all wondered to ourselves what might make a speech masculine or feminine, no one batted an eye at the underlying revelation: that the campaign was writing the nominee's speech before knowing who the nominee would be."

Kev's take

Not a real big surprise. Unfortunately much of America is too damn stupid to notice or care.And the big ole MSM (main stream media) is too busy being mean and sexist , asking things like "who is she?", "what was the vetting process?', "what are her positions on anything but abortion?"to do much reporting on the martial law siege being laid in down Minn/St. Paul to "protect" the conventioneers. (seen the video of the "rioter" standing still holding a flower, who got a face full of mace from riot cops? Not a little can, the "giant wasps' nest" - stand 30 feet away kind of can)
--------------------------
From the "even stranger" dept. Palin's name was being bandied about as potential VP in early March - BEFORE there was a Republican Presidential nominee. - WTF? who was doing this?

Article about her "I'm 7 months prego" announcement (much to the surprise of everyone in Alaska - and the RNC?)

http://www.adn.com/front/story/336402.html

McCain "officially" clinched March 5th, the day "before" this article appeared - article was published online @ 12:02 a.m on 3/6.

Seems "they" picked a VP first... (anyone see a less-outwardly-scary, tina-fey-esque, softer-but-tougher-too-hockey-mom Katherine Harris-type here?)

On the stupid-guy yes/no question...Yes, I would let her spank me.